<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:57:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/?page_id=94#comment-10</guid>
		<description>It seems the bike/pedestrian pathways would have to be wide enough for emergency vehicle access. Also a mini-light rail or small people-mover transporter may help with ADA access to the various parts of the linear community and during harsh weather conditions.

For better earthquake resistance, maybe the support towers could be encased in concrete. Also some additional structures could be added in the north/south direction at intervals which would act as struts to stabilize the tall and narrow structure. Maybe add anchors on piers to the north and south with cables similar to the cables that stabilize a radio tower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the bike/pedestrian pathways would have to be wide enough for emergency vehicle access. Also a mini-light rail or small people-mover transporter may help with ADA access to the various parts of the linear community and during harsh weather conditions.</p>
<p>For better earthquake resistance, maybe the support towers could be encased in concrete. Also some additional structures could be added in the north/south direction at intervals which would act as struts to stabilize the tall and narrow structure. Maybe add anchors on piers to the north and south with cables similar to the cables that stabilize a radio tower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/?page_id=94#comment-8</guid>
		<description>i think this as many other resources are (will be) underuse. my applause to this kind of ideas and efforts to be more logic and effective with what we have and not with what we don,t have. the amount of money to rebuild a structure like this is so high that everybody is obbligate to support this effort and try to be concient about reuse and not to destroy. tks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this as many other resources are (will be) underuse. my applause to this kind of ideas and efforts to be more logic and effective with what we have and not with what we don,t have. the amount of money to rebuild a structure like this is so high that everybody is obbligate to support this effort and try to be concient about reuse and not to destroy. tks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cat</title>
		<link>http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/?page_id=94#comment-4</guid>
		<description>get rid of that thing! 
or the next earthquake will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get rid of that thing!<br />
or the next earthquake will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imagine the Bridge&#8217;s Eastern Span as a Suspended Park - Bay Area Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Imagine the Bridge&#8217;s Eastern Span as a Suspended Park - Bay Area Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/?page_id=94#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] shows architectural designs, a time line of the bridge&#8217;s history and video that captures the debate over the safety of the bridge&#8217;s eastern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shows architectural designs, a time line of the bridge&#8217;s history and video that captures the debate over the safety of the bridge&#8217;s eastern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
